Use of a video Laryngoscope to reduce complications of transesophageal echocardiography probe insertion: a multicenter randomized study
Article summarized by Gabija Valauskaite, MD
URL: https://www.jcvaonline.com/article/S1053-0770(22)00534-1/fulltext
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2022.07.017
Published online: Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 21 July 2022
Authors: Deepak Borde, Kumar C, Amish Jasapara, Vijay Shetty, Nilesh Juvekar, Vinayak Desurkar, Jyoti Gaidu, Pooja Joshi, Balaji Asegaonkar, Unnikrihnan KP, Vipinraj V, Shreedhar Joshi, Thomas Koshy
Article description
Summary:
- The article aim was to to determine whether use of video laryngoscope (VL) could reduce complications related to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) probe insertion;
- A multicenter randomized control study;
- The study analyzed 363 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery;
- The patients were randomized into 2 groups the conventional group (n = 177) and the VL group (n = 186) for TEE probe insertion;
- Primary endpoint: the incidence of orophraryngeal injury was higher in conventional group (n = 26; 14.7%) compared to the VL group (n = 14; 7.5%; p = 0.029);
- Secondary endpoint: in VL goup probe was inserted in the first attempt in 95% of patients, whereas in conventional group 87% of patients (p = 0.023);
- The most common relation between the esophageal inlet and the larynx was posterolateral (n = 88; 47%), followed by posterior (n = 77; 41%) and lateral (n = 21;12%);
Conclusions:
- VL was associated with a lesser incidence of injury compared to the conventional technique;
- The VL guidance was associated with fewer attempts for a successful probe placement compared to the conventional technique;
Read the article, share your comments, and participate in the EACTAIC POLLs.